Bexhill Branch
congregation #341086
created 2019-01-21 by mpimport
official name: Bexhill Branch
assertion #3602866 by mpimport on 2019-01-21: confidence 100%.
is a(n): branch
assertion #3602868 by mpimport on 2019-01-21: confidence 100%.
started: 20 Jul 1852 (source: Margetts)
assertion #3602860 by mpimport on 2019-01-21: confidence 100%.
ended: 23 Dec 1855 (source: Margetts)
assertion #3602861 by mpimport on 2019-01-21: confidence 100%.
religion: LDS
assertion #3602858 by mpimport on 2019-01-21: confidence 100%.
located at: Bexhill, East Sussex, England, United Kingdom
assertion #3602859 by mpimport on 2019-01-21: confidence 100%.
location: 50°50'33"N, 0°28'22"E (approximate size: 10000-100000 m, accurate within: 10000-100000 m)
assertion #3303500 by mpimport on 2019-01-21: confidence 50%.
membership/population: 18 (on: 18 Sep 1852)
assertion #3602870 by mpimport on 2019-01-21: confidence 100%.
part of: Kent Conference
entity #601748, assertion #3602867 by mpimport on 2019-01-21: confidence 100%.
succeeded by: Hastings Branch
entity #381089, assertion #3602869 by mpimport on 2019-01-21: confidence 100%.
in group: mission branches
assertion #3602882 by mpimport on 2019-01-21: confidence 100%.
claimed with confidence (0 to 1): 0.31
assertion #3602873 by mpimport on 2019-01-21: confidence 100%.
see also: Kent Conf. Min. Book No. 1:68, 5:16
assertion #3602874 by mpimport on 2019-01-21: confidence 100%.
see also: British MMH (source part: 4:1:86)
entity #800500, assertion #3602878 by mpimport on 2019-01-21: confidence 100%.
see also: FHL Record of Members (catalog entry: www.familysearch.org, source part: 1852-1855 Mem 086,980)
entity #800111, assertion #3602875 by mpimport on 2019-01-21: confidence 100%.
see also: British MMH (source part: (9:1:8))
entity #800500, assertion #3602880 by mpimport on 2019-01-21: confidence 100%.
notes: In BMMH vol. 9, there is an entry regarding a "Rexhill" Branch but I believe it was just a mispelling because it refers to the location of Bexhill and also describes the branch as being in the Kent Conference - it has similar dates of existence as well. It also mentions that this branch was annexed to the Hastings Branch in 1852, but it existed on its own by 1855 so maybe it was re-separated
assertion #3602872 by mpimport on 2019-01-21: confidence 100%.
